Reviewers Guidelines
We provide clear guidelines to ensure a rigorous, fair, and transparent peer-review process.
The role of peer review in management and economics review
Peer review is a key step in the academic publishing process. Acting as a rigorous filter for all submitted manuscripts, the peer review process ensures that every article published in Management and Economics Review maintains the highest standards of academic quality.
We are deeply grateful to our reviewers, whose expertise helps us guarantee fairness, transparency, and integrity in every editorial decision. Their valuable input supports the advancement of management and economics research while guiding authors to improve their scholarly work.
Reviewer Responsibilities
To ensure the best possible evaluation, reviewers are expected to:
Confirm that the manuscript matches their area of expertise.
Allocate sufficient time to complete the review within the given deadline.
Declare any potential conflicts of interest that may affect the review process.
Respect confidentiality: both the manuscript and review comments must remain privileged information.
Provide constructive feedback through the editorial system — reviewers should not contact authors directly.
By following these guidelines, reviewers play a central role in strengthening the peer review process and in maintaining the reputation of Management and Economics Review as a trusted academic journal.
Core values of the peer review process
Reviewers provide informed evaluations only within their field of knowledge, ensuring each manuscript is assessed with scholarly accuracy and relevance.
Allocating sufficient time to review guarantees thoughtful, high-quality feedback delivered within the editorial deadlines.
Declaring conflicts of interest protects the fairness and objectivity of the peer review process.
Reviewers safeguard the confidentiality of manuscripts and comments, maintaining trust and ethical standards in academic publishing.
Through clear and structured feedback, reviewers support authors in improving their work and advancing research in management and economics.
Reviewer evaluation criteria for manuscripts
Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the academic standards of Management and Economics Review. Each evaluation should provide objective, constructive feedback and assess manuscripts according to the following criteria.
1) The topic of the manuscript is relevant for Management and Economics Review’s theme and topics. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach Management and Economics Review publishes papers on a wide range of topics related to management science and practice:
Research on strategic decision-making, competitive advantage, and long-term business sustainability.
Insights into project planning, resource allocation and performance optimization.
Research on organizational learning, innovation and knowledge transfer.
Studies on ethical practices, corporate governance and social impact.
Research on performance standards, continuous improvement and excellence frameworks.
Studies on recruitment, talent development and organizational performance.
Approaches to identifying, assessing and mitigating organizational risks.
Research on efficiency, supply chain strategies and process optimization.
Insights into capital structure, corporate finance and decision-making tools.
Research on cross-border trade, multinational strategies and cultural dimensions.
Studies on portfolio strategies, financial markets and sustainable investment practices.
Quantitative and qualitative approaches to explain and forecast economic dynamics.
Analysis of consumer behavior, market dynamics and decision-making patterns.
Evaluation of economic policies, social welfare and income distribution.
Models and simulations supporting economic prediction and scenario planning.
Research on trade flows, competitiveness and global economic integration.
Studies on growth policies, innovation and emerging markets transformation.
Analyses of sustainability, resource use and environmental policy.
Studies on renewable resources, energy efficiency and sustainable exploitation.
Analyses of drivers of productivity, competitiveness and long-term expansion.
2) Contribution to the Field of Management and Economics
The manuscript should demonstrate a clear contribution to the advancement of knowledge in the Economy and Management field. Reviewers are encouraged to assess the novelty, originality, and significance of the study, emphasizing how the paper’s core arguments enhance understanding within these disciplines. Highlighting the relevance, innovation, and academic impact of the research will help determine whether the article is outstanding for both the field and the journal’s readership.
3) Integration of Seminal and Relevant Literature
A well-prepared manuscript must engage critically with seminal works and relevant research in the field. Reviewers should evaluate the author’s ability to contextualize their study within existing literature and to acknowledge significant prior contributions. It is essential that each paper provides evidence of previous findings, outlines differences in approach or results, and clearly situates the current research within the broader academic dialogue.
4) Scholarly and Methodological Quality
The academic rigor and methodological robustness of the manuscript are vital indicators of its suitability for publication. Reviewers should verify that the study follows sound research principles, applies appropriate analytical tools, and presents valid, well-supported conclusions. This criterion ensures the scientific integrity of the paper and confirms its alignment with the high standards of the Management and Economics Review.
5) Clarity, Structure, and Academic Writing Style
The manuscript should be clearly written, logically structured, and stylistically appropriate for an academic audience. Reviewers must confirm that the text is fluent, coherent, and accessible not only to specialists but also to general readers with an interest in management and economics. Each paper should maintain conciseness, grammatical accuracy, and a professional tone, free from spelling or formatting errors.
Reviewer’s final recommendation
Based on the overall evaluation, reviewers are invited to select one of the following recommendation categories:
Accept As Submitted (minor editorial corrections only)
Accept With Suggested Revisions
Possibly Accept After Extensive Revisions
Reject
If revisions are requested, reviewers should inform the Editor-in-Chief whether they are willing to assess the revised manuscript after resubmission.
Become part of our academic community
Join the Management and Economics Review network — whether as a Reviewer, Author, or Reader. Stay informed about new research, calls for papers, and academic events.